What's up with that? And what if she ends up bedding the King? Is she supposed to pretend that their supposed progeny is all Wesen? What if the baby is pure Grimm? What happens then? They'll be able to figure that out almost immediately - or as soon as the baby looks at one them, mid-woge. Instead her first thought is that she has to find a man to sleep with, pronto.

What did you think of Adalind and her big plan to deal with her unexpected pregnancy?Дoug: She seemed so horrified at the thought of being pregnant that it surprises me she didn't consider ending her pregnancy. 3) Renard isn't exactly chatty about his heritage. Part of the problem here is that we really don't know much at all about Zaubers, for a few reasons: 1) Our sample size so far is one. Renard, we know doesn't seem to have much, if anything, in the way of sorcerous ability, but we really can't say if that's Zaubers in general or just him. Kathleen: I love Robin's response! I'd hate being repeatedly called a girl, too, if I were a guy! Anyway, it would be interesting to meet another Zauberbiest so we could compare him to Renard. I could use a refresher on all of this, honestly. I don't think Renard's father is a Hexenbiest, but his mom clearly is. I don't know enough about Wesen mating, but maybe to be a born a Hexenbiest, both your parents have to be Hexenbiests. Could also be Renard just hates being called a girl.ДЄllison: I'm not sure, but there is obviously a difference in power and blood. Could be there are some inherent differences based on their biological gender. Robin: If I remember correctly, a Hexenbiest is female, and a Zauberbiest is male. Any thoughts on what he might mean by that?Дoug: Outside of the difference in the blood, I have no idea. Renard remarked in exasperation that he's a Zauberbiest, not a Hexenbiest, and that there's a difference between the two. That said, they did gloss over the morality of it a bit. I think that the fact that it's probably not permanent lessens the moral quandary at some level it's not like the protagonist had a lot of options here. Kathleen: I agree with Doug that there's a practical problem with the hormone therapy in the long run. Unless it just suppressed her down deep enough to where Linus couldn't find her, but I'm more inclined to believe that Stacy will never be found again. I am not familiar enough with hormone treatments to be able to guess at how long it would last, but from how Linus talked about it, it seemed like the treatment essentially killed Stacy. Linus talking about how he couldn't find Stacy broke my heart. It seemed callous.ДЄllison: I understand why they did it, and it is more preferable than killing them both, but it was cruel. That said, what bothered me most about it wasn't just the ethics, but how flippant and dismissive Hank and Nick were when Linus was distressed about losing Stacy after what they did. Robin: I'm with Monroe on this I understood the need, but trapping someone in one of their personalities without their consent or understanding was unethical. It would have been better for Nick to have lopped his head off вЂ“ the guy/girl is dangerous. Doug: The only thing I could think of was: how long does is that hormone therapy supposed to last? And how do Nick and company inform the prison that he needs to be kept on it, with regular doses? It seemed like a huge plot hole to me.

Hexenbiest face